Skip to content

Organizational Integration

Weight: 10%
Sources verified Dec 22

Why It Matters

Individual skill without team practices leads to inconsistent quality. DORA 2025: AI amplifies existing capabilities—strong teams get stronger, struggling teams get worse. Organizational readiness determines whether AI helps or hurts.

Assessment Questions (9)

Maximum possible score: 49 points

Q1 single choice 5 pts

Does your team have guidelines for when/how to use Copilot?

[1] No guidelines exist
[2] Informal/verbal guidelines
[3] Documented guidelines exist
[4] Documented and actively enforced/reviewed
[5] Guidelines include agentic workflow policies

Q2 single choice 5 pts

How does your team handle code review for AI-generated code?

[2] Same as any other code
[3] We mention when code is AI-generated
[4] AI code gets extra scrutiny/different checklist
[4] We have specific AI code review guidelines
[5] We use AI code review tools + human review for AI code

Note: 2025 update: AI-assisted code review (CodeRabbit, etc.) is emerging practice for managing volume

Q3 single choice 5 pts

Does your organization have policies for agent mode / autonomous AI coding?

[0] We don't use agent mode
[1] No policies - individual discretion
[2] Informal guidance on when to use
[4] Documented policies on scope and review requirements
[5] Policies + automated safeguards (PR size limits, required reviews)

Q4 multi select 9 pts

What AI coding tool training have you received?

[0] None
[1] Self-taught / experimentation
[2] Internal team training or documentation
[2] Official GitHub/Microsoft/Anthropic training
[2] Copilot certification or Microsoft Applied Skills
[2] Training on agentic workflows and agent supervision

Q5 single choice 5 pts

How does your team share AI coding tips, tricks, and learnings?

[1] We don't - everyone figures it out alone
[2] Occasionally in conversation
[3] Regular discussions (standups, retros, Slack)
[4] Dedicated sessions or documentation
[5] Shared prompt/rules libraries and regular reviews

Q6 single choice 5 pts

Does AI-generated code have different testing requirements?

[2] No - same testing as any code
[3] Informally encouraged to test more
[4] Yes - higher coverage or specific test types required
[5] Yes - plus security scanning requirements for AI code

Note: Given 45% vulnerability rate (Veracode 2025), security scanning for AI code is recommended

Q7 single choice 5 pts

Does your organization track AI coding tool effectiveness?

[1] No metrics tracked
[2] Basic adoption metrics (licenses, usage)
[3] Behavior metrics (acceptance rate, engagement)
[4] Outcome metrics (code quality, defects, velocity)
[5] Full measurement framework (adoption + behavior + outcomes)

Note: DORA 2025 recommends three-layer measurement: adoption, behavior, outcomes. Leading AI tool vendors track ARR growth as adoption proxy.

Q8 single choice 5 pts

Does your organization provide dedicated time for AI tool learning?

[1] No dedicated time - learn on your own
[2] Learning is allowed but not scheduled
[4] 1-2 hours/week of dedicated AI learning time
[5] Regular learning time + structured curriculum/mentorship

Note: DORA 2025: Dedicated learning time leads to 131% increase in team AI adoption

Q9 single choice 5 pts

Has your organization redesigned workflows specifically for AI tools?

[1] No - same workflows, just added AI tools
[2] Minor adjustments (e.g., prompt templates)
[3] Some workflow changes (e.g., review processes)
[4] Significant redesign of development processes
[5] Transformative changes - AI-first workflows

Note: McKinsey 2025: High performers are 3x more likely to redesign workflows for AI. Rakuten achieved 79% time reduction with Slack-integrated AI coding.

Tempered AI Forged Through Practice, Not Hype

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next page
k
Previous page
h
Section home
/
Search
?
Show shortcuts
m
Toggle sidebar
Esc
Close modal
Shift+R
Reset all progress
? Keyboard shortcuts